SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (4773)5/9/2001 1:03:14 PM
From: thames_siderRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 6089
 
On X's chicken... ROFL. Given that innocent meaning, I don't think I'll mention what had wandered through my head. It just wouldn't be decent.

For the jury case, ugh. I'd hate to sort that out. And the men who excused themselves were clearly fools... stay and give a sentence of 30 days, or whatever the minimum. Maybe give the daughter a hefty fine - 18 is old enough for adult responsibility, surely... but then, how would she pay it? (rhetorical). And, I suppose I can even sympathise with the attitude of the county... NIMBY perhaps, but few want prostitution, porn industries, etc. active in *their* area, and they have to use someone as an example.
Still, not the kind of thing that should really be brought before a court. (Except I'd love to have heard the lawyers arguing over the precise definition of sodomy, given two women... ahem).

NO, I won't mention the chickens.

Well, probably not.

But I am feeling puckish today.

OK, I'll hint on the chickens. But X is not allowed to read any further in case she regresses to one of the Erinyes.

|
|
v

Think on the context of this thread, like sexual practices which might be deemed worthy of arrest.

Now reflect on the common mode of distinction between 'erotic' and 'kinky', where erotic involves the feather...

And so I naturally assumed there was some historical exploit (sexploit? Xploit?) forever comemmorated on SI...

---------------ts------->!