SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Allen Benn who wrote (9614)5/10/2001 7:21:07 AM
From: Bill Fischofer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10309
 
Whoa there! That's a pretty big premise: "...let’s agree we insist on retaining full functional equivalence to IxWorks running on an Intel IOP". I don't see how such a premise is justified and certainly that's not how BlueArc's box is architected (nor is that what's going on inside EMC or NTAP boxes either). The interface requirements are IP and Gigabit ethernet since that's the only thing that can be "seen" across the wire. And that appears to be what BlueArc has implemented directly in hardware via PLAs.

Nick Tredennick (part of the Gilder group) publishes an interesting newsletter titled "Dynamic Silicon" which is focused on the area of reconfigurable hardware. He seems to be of the opinion that we are moving past the microprocessor as the driving force in silicon technology and that PLAs represent the "next wave" of innovation. I'll have to ask him for his thoughts on WIND in this area.



To: Allen Benn who wrote (9614)5/11/2001 12:05:40 PM
From: James Connolly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10309
 
Allen,

In the light of your last post about IOP's and FPGA's, I think it's worth posting WIND's white paper on re-configurable computing again.
wrs.com

Q: Assuming the host OS is I2O compliant (i.e. has an OSM) do you think it would be relatively easy or even possible to upgrade an existing sever with a NIC to one with an iNIC ?

Thanks
JC.