Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (134547)	5/10/2001 2:38:46 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re:"What about VIA - switching from a KT133 to a KT133A - where are YOUR TEARS AND OUTRAGE OF THAT ?" Outrage at enabling ATA-100 rather than ATA-66? Paul, your a funny guy. Jim

To: Paul Engel who wrote (134547)	5/10/2001 11:20:36 AM
From: dale_laroy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

>Was it the same company that forced vendors to use new Motherboards with a 760 chip set instead of a 750 chip set - instead of Socket A to a Slot A ?< If this comment were coherent, maybe I could respond. >What about VIA - switching from a KT133 to a KT133A - where are YOUR TEARS AND OUTRAGE OF THAT ?< As far as I know, the KT133 is still available. >Are you going to cry HOLY HELL when AMD's HAMSTER CHIPS don't fit into an ATHWIPER socket?< I will if AMD discontinues production of Duron/Athlon as soon after they introduce Hammer as Intel will be Coppermine after the introduction of Tualatin. But, I don't expect this to happen. AMD introduced the Socket-7 K6-2+ and even ramped its speed grade well after Athlon was introduced. How many new Socket-7 processors did Intel introduce after the introduction of P-II?