SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JOHN W. who wrote (76768)5/10/2001 2:16:17 PM
From: Stoctrash  Respond to of 99985
 
Arch Crawford!!!

...nothing more need be said...LOL!!



To: JOHN W. who wrote (76768)5/10/2001 9:26:46 PM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 99985
 
that was good one, you could tell it was happening, the bears were so full of themselves they were composing songs, dreaming about driving down freeways with no cars on them.

LOL

That said, the nazzy might be tested soon. Just so happens that 2000 is the level the testing could happening at. Not only is 2000 important on a psychological level, (those around numbers are so obvious aren't they? <g>) but the recent low of the sideways action was at that 2000 level too.

stockcharts.com[w,a]dbolnimy[db][pb25!b50!b100!b200!a2000!f][vc60][iUc20!Ua12,26,9!Lb14!Lf!Lg!Lj[$spx]]

But then again, that little ascending triangle is a pesky bugeru in the negitory soup. <g>

B



To: JOHN W. who wrote (76768)5/10/2001 9:42:43 PM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 99985
 
<I often enjoy the BS from the bears too, like the following that were calling for the crash> i must have been hallucinating,i thought NASD was above 5000 not so very long ago,i guess it never happened,o poor poor bear am i.:)
btw,we all know Stcgg is god's gift to hyperbole.
he quite possibly was ranting about a massive bull rally the next day.max