Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (72502)	5/10/2001 3:43:06 PM
From: SBHX	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

As a factual point, I don't know if the rmbs longs realize this, but the finding of fraud was very explicit in that Infineon was able to prove to a jury that RMBS was attending the jedec meetings ...and... modifying their patent applications to match the jedec standards. This is not just a question of not disclosing any pending patent filing. If not overturned, the implication to the company is actually a lot more severe than that. biz.yahoo.com

To: Petz who wrote (72502)	5/10/2001 3:50:53 PM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

You should be arguing with Tinkershaw. No one has proven any harm befell Infineon even Infineon it seems. Actually, Infineon has benefited from not having to pay royalties. In fact, the jury and the judge awarded only $1 in actual damages the rest was punitive damages. So while your argument may be true in other cases in this case it does not apply.