Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: muzosi who wrote (134609)	5/10/2001 9:59:04 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

by this do you mean arm won't get royalties on xscale ? I believe Intel has a license and ARM will continue to benefit. In what way is unclear. A flat license fee or royalties? I believe Intel also has the right to extend the instruction set. EP

To: muzosi who wrote (134609)	5/10/2001 11:35:39 PM
From: Robert Salasidis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

According to the book 'ARM System Architecture'. the SrongARM CPU was designed by DEC with collaboration from ARM. It uses a modified Harvard Architecture (sep I and data cache). The instruction set is, I believe unchanged. I would assume that ARM still makes a royalty fee from Intel's XScale design, but the Intel CPUs are higher performance, than other designs, and thereby sell for more $. I would assume the Intel margin per CPU is therefore better than standard ARM7/9 core CPU designs