Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (13498)	5/11/2001 5:29:25 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The snow over the last couple of weeks was weird. It was followed for several days with constant rain, like in the pacific Northwest. That was even weirder. Spring has sprung now. I walk past some lilacs every day. I fantasize about cutting a bushel basket of them and laying my head down in them like a pillow. Shall I use the word "weird" a third time...nah. ooops

To: Neocon who wrote (13498)	5/11/2001 5:45:27 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

Something has been puzzling me for many years. I'll bet you could clear it up. I once heard a spelling rule that went like this: "i before e, except after c, as in neighbor and weigh." There is no "c" in neighbor and weigh. So why does the rule suggest that neighbor and weigh are examples of the stated exception. It does appear that when "i" and "e" are together the i usually comes first and that when preceeded by a "c" the rule changes. This all came back to me when I decided to look up the spelling for "weird." Why would grammarians make up such a stupid rule? Or, did I hear it wrong? Because if it was "and in neighbor and weigh" that would make sense but they left out "weird."