Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (1853)	5/12/2001 6:16:06 PM
From: Poet	Respond to of 5315

Boy that was a very good get by the unLucretius. And a typically haughty response. Sad.

To: Tim Luke who wrote (1853)	5/12/2001 7:11:43 PM
From: wlcnyc	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5315

Tim, Didn't you once ask of the J woman who WE is(are?). Perhaps this exchange answers the question: "Jenns, In your post #1729, you wrote the opposite of what you are saying in post #1740:" investorshub.com "...A thread is a compilation of various individuals and they could be posting from a lock-up or anywhere on this planet for all we know. You don't have to go far to see the diversity of posters on this and other forums, you don't even know if they are over 10 years old. It is you business to check out all posts. Only the extremely naive will attach too much significance to a thread on a public message board. Remember anyone who posts on a public forum might be posting from a federal lock-up facility, a mental health institution,..." investorshub.com Is the trying to say that the two posts - 1729 and 1740 -were written by two different people (from different institutions)?! Bill