SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (39389)5/13/2001 9:49:31 PM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
> Precisely, that 63% LARGER - making it at least 63%
> more expensive than Intel's Pentium III.

Actually, it would be more than 63% more expensive, as cost goes up superlinearly with die size (because defects increase with die size).

However, I point out also that in the mobile market, the extra cost might not be such a horrible thing. Intel is clearly not yet willing to drop mobile prices to the point where AMD's mobile margins (er, I mean the margins they'll be getting once this product moves out; right now, of course, their margins are pretty much nonexistent, mobile spitfire notwithstanding) make the laptop market unprofitable for them. Even with the cost disadvantage and the rather astounding undercut in price compared to the PIII, I suspect that AMD's pretty happy with the mobile margins that they're looking at.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (39389)5/13/2001 9:52:35 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
RE:"That's a BIG cost disadvantage compared to the 90 sq. mm. Pentium III !!!
Precisely, that 63% LARGER - making it at least 63% more expensive than Intel's Pentium III."

This is very true. Intel could slash mobile chip prices to the bone and realy stick it to AMD. Do you think they will?
After all, they can make up the shrinking margin with those server chips, eh? <G>