SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (135073)5/15/2001 10:40:39 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Windsock,

There is little difference between doing the first SSE implementation, and a copy. Once the architectural spec is laid out, the amount of effort required to implement is going to be approximately the same for either company.

AMD was slow with SSE, because some at AMD believed that 3D-NOW! would win. LOL

Scumbria



To: Windsock who wrote (135073)5/15/2001 1:08:04 PM
From: dale_laroy  Respond to of 186894
 
>Why is AMD so slow implementing SSE? It should take less time to develop when AMD is just copying SSE after Intel did all the heavy lifting developing the technology.<

SSE+ is implemented in Palomino, which I consider early enough (although I which Palomino would have been here earlier). SSE2+ (SSE2 plus 3DNow! compatibility) will only have to wait for Thoroughbred.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News