Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (2073)	5/16/2001 12:12:53 PM
From: Electric	Respond to of 5315

Tim, What I have noticed is she talks in generalities..always just that X stock is a good pick, or "We are playing stock X, or it was on our list" She never speaks of entry prices or exit prices..unlike many on here who give entry and exit numbers with loss or gain figures.. What is too bad, really too bad is that she had a good thing..keep with charging for a news letter, make $$$ trading on your own, but the second you go into the venture she did, with a lack of background she has (not in trading, but in the venture side) there is when you get in trouble..if she wanted to go into a venture, she should have taken partners, a percentage, but not been active in the biz side which took away from what she did well.. One cannot wear multiple hats and keep a facade from failing in one of the areas.. It has to do with greed or the inability of telling people no.. In my view she got in deep, people called her on some of her statements and now she is in doo-doo.. I hope she gets what she deserves..she should have kept it simple, or pulled back from the day to day stock calling/trading..