Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (15921)	5/17/2001 10:47:40 AM
From: Amots	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Zeev. AMAT is in a nice channel for a long time now (short @54, Long @50-51), which way do you think they could brake?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (15921)	5/17/2001 10:57:29 AM
From: TREND1	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 30051

Zeev:NY times article studied 1900 tech stocks since 1985 below $10 Only 3.14% rise above $15 within one year. Your SCON is $5.62. SCON has to fight the odds. Larry Dudash PS: Since reading article I buy only stocks above $20

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (15921)	5/17/2001 11:02:27 AM
From: Rich1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Thanks Zeev you think this run takes us to where 2300??

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (15921)	5/17/2001 12:04:54 PM
From: golfnut777	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Zeev, re: SCON, why is the short interest nearly 50% and what do you see as the catalyst to cause a squeeze ?