SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fingolfen who wrote (135373)5/17/2001 1:12:39 PM
From: Rob Young  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
"Calling Itanium Itanic"

Unprofessional?

Come on... as if we are getting paid to debate each other.

Unprofessional? Last guy that sent that my way was on the nasty
end of an email. I pointed out to him if he knew what he was talking about
he wouldn't have to stoop to using that term.

"Your posts are also laced with many of the fictional comparisons for which anti-Intel rhetoric is notorious... "The
Emperor has no clothes..." Again, if you're going to debate, debate... don't make nursery-rhymes."

Fine, point taken. So maybe you can come up with something as a
counter-point to what I said and we can debate that. Otherwise, you are
much like Tench. Left to trading barbs or commenting on style.

Got anything to say to my reply to Amy of substance?

Probably not.

Rob



To: fingolfen who wrote (135373)5/17/2001 2:23:33 PM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 186894
 
fingolfen, it just hit me, claiming the "Itanic" nomenclature as unprofessional conduct in Paul Engel's presence is a little ironic, perhaps?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News