SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tcmay who wrote (135586)5/20/2001 9:53:32 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Hmmm, that's cheaper than I would have expected. Almost ready for prime time, it seems.Using Fluorinert (or water, for those who might prefer it) should become important when the costs of this kind of cooling give enough system performance improvements. At $180, that time may be close at hand.

Hmmm, this sounds like just the solution for Intel's P4 throttling fiasco. Yep... Yep.... that's the ticket. It might just keep the die temperature low enough so as Thermal
Monitor is not needed. Might even prevent all those false advertisement law suits that are probably just around the corner. I remember seeing those big 1.7GHz placards all over the place in the ads but I don't recall any disclaimers stating the following:

This system, under typical real world operating conditions may overheat. Should these real world operating conditions occur, under the control of Intel's thermal control circuit (TCC), this system may be clock throttled down from an advertised frequency of 1.7GHz to an effective frequency of .85GHz.

THE WATSONYOUTH