SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: EnricoPalazzo who wrote (42993)5/26/2001 2:28:10 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 54805
 
"I'm aware of one--the Richmond verdict. What are the other two?"

Judge Payne, panel of judges who turned down the Rambus
protest, and Virginia jury. In my book it is three.

"It is my opinion that RMBS did not commit fraud,
legally or morally."

We clearly have a difference in opinions. Here are
few excerpts from a court document:
Message 15714482
Clearly my opinion was shared by couple of judges
and the court of Virginia, who are highly familiar
with all evidences. And what is your opinion worth?

And why should anyone listen to Yahoo and Fool.com?
Aren't you familiar with the meaning of word "fool"?

- Ali



To: EnricoPalazzo who wrote (42993)5/26/2001 11:27:08 AM
From: tekboy  Read Replies (7) | Respond to of 54805
 
Out of curiosity, can anyone point to a single documented case of a Rambus bull convincing a Rambus bear of anything or vice versa?

tekboyy/Ares@neverrhavesomanypostedsomuchforsolittle.com