Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jane4IceCream who wrote (2871)	5/28/2001 11:55:28 PM
From: Francois Goelo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Jane, wouldn't it make more sense if you asked them?.... Here are a couple guesses: 1) Hardcore Bashing Shorters, such as Auric, Whocares, etc... object to my being a Vocal Long on certain stocks they short and to having provided an Affidavit in the ZSUN Lawsuit for Libel, which ended with a Stipulation that they cease and desist posting on any ZSUN Thread... 2) The SI Possee wanted their pal Bob to take control over at iHUB, to do mostly as they pleased with their embedded Links and other paraphernalia... It didn't work out and I happened to be one of the "Old Guard" who objected to Bob, based on his past actions on SI... 3) Then you have the Compulsive Libel Thrower and if you followed that, I need not say any more... Other than that, I continue to express my mind where and whenever practical and try to remain civil with the occasional sarcastic touch, in spite of TLC, who thinks he's got the Monopoly... If you also want to know whether SEVU or TRIM paid me directly or indirectly to post about their stock, the answer is a resounding No... JMHO, F. Goelo + + + PS: I know plenty of friendly posters, with whom I communicate regularly on and off Thread but they usually don't post here on such mundane subjects...