SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (14876)5/29/2001 6:44:32 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Based on comments received, I have wordsmithed my criteria as follows:

Karen's Compleat Criteria for Wrongdoing

1. Violence except in defense of life or serious and immediate physical harm to persons or irreplaceable property
2. Breach of trust
3. Denigration of the individual human dignity of one's fellows



To: Lane3 who wrote (14876)5/29/2001 6:48:52 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"then you have to confront the individual in some form or fashion to either stop the breaches or make yourself whole."

I agree whole heartedly. However, I bet this doesn't make us any more alike. My way of confrontation would be to label the breacher according to the breach. I bet, for example, that over the last couple of years when I would call bill clinton a liar it makes you cringe and that you see it as unnecessary and denigrating. Just a guess.

"I think that if one is being abused, one need not be too concerned about maintaining the dignity of the abuser. And I don't think you have any business admiring someone who would abuse you or who would abuse me. Abusive behavior is wrong. Moral people don't admire it."

See. I consider bill c. to have been one of the most abusive yet admired persons of our time. And I bet you were thinking of bin laudin or somebody. I don't admire bin laudin but I bet I could find somebody that I consider moral and you think of as abusive.