Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (149843)	5/31/2001 6:51:29 AM
From: ColtonGang	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

But they are the daughters of our president and should be more responsible than others their age. I'm sure George and Laura would have liked their involved daughter to be at Georgetown rather than Univ of Texas, so they could keep an eye on her. You didn't see Clinton's daughter making headlines 6 months into her father's presidency.

To: JDN who wrote (149843)	5/31/2001 12:33:42 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Just thinking back, the only one who ever attacked Chelsea was McCain. Keeping the President's children off limits was a sensible policy. But, as usual, one rule for Republicans, completely different one for Democrats. This attack on the Bush children is really hitting below the belt.

To: JDN who wrote (149843)	5/31/2001 1:00:00 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Consider the source of the attack. I think that reputable Democrats consider this subject to be off-limits. Some simply do not, as they would like to compare it to hummers in the Oval Office (and deny the perjury fact). I am disgusted with the lack of judgement that Jenna has displayed, here, but she's not my daughter. Furthermore, I am not the President. One has to wonder what type of psychological effect that a parent being President has on a not-fully-developed sense of judgment, and/or the desire to rebel. ~SB~