Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (15117)	5/31/2001 4:14:24 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Oh I see, it's only gutless when others do it but it OK for you I had said this: Of course, you are right. But I wanted to gentle him a bit before undoing the tether. I would have been unfair to myself, if I had let huge lies and attacks against me stand. It is unfortunate that the high road of logical truth must sometimes be defended in muddy lowland swamps. The only reference that referred to you was that I wanted to gentle you a bit before disengaging the ntether that tied me to you in an unpleasant and one-dided discussion. SO--you are intentionally NOT getting it." I was responding to a post directed at me about you. I did not gratuitously toss insults and lies at you. I explained to someone why I felt compelled to defend myself by responding to your personal attacks. My statement was about me, <>not about you. It only touched on you sufficiently to acnowledge what it was I was responding to, and it did so without name calling or vulgar lies, but merely to satisfy minimum requirements of context and content. You may continue to pretend that all posts are morally equivalent if you wish to, but you've wasted enough of my time on that particular issue. So--Are you still working on the subjective biblical support for pedophilia, or are you no longer fascibnated by the topic?