Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (70934)	6/1/2001 12:34:53 AM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116764

<<Or this thread could continue viewing the present using the questionable in form and function from the data on Bob's gold sheet site. >> If you have a problem with the data, take it up with GFMS. Otherwise, get off my back and leave me out of your posts. (as I have previously repeatedly respectfully requested) On a positive note, it appears you stopped posting your repetitive GATAnut NEWS Thank you, much appreciated.

To: d:oug who wrote (70934)	6/1/2001 7:48:35 AM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 116764

"Anyone willing to...?" Looks like nope, as in all are dopes? Plaintiff's new brief in suit against BIS, Fed, Treasury, & bullion banks. groups.yahoo.com goldensextant.com ... [should] the Court allow the filing... the plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court also accept this qualified opposition as the plaintiff's response thereto..... ... filed in support thereof. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff suggests that the reply memoranda submitted by Messrs. O'Neill, Greenspan, and the BIS are unlikely to be of much assistance to the Court, takes no position on whether the Court should grant the motions for leave to file them, but requests that if leave is granted, the Court also accept this qualified opposition as the plaintiff's response thereto. -END-