SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (15177)6/1/2001 6:42:55 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
There is a big difference between the Middle Way and the Aristotle's idea of the mean, actually.

Thanks for the answer , especially on Dasein.
That is hugely fascinating , and ties much
together in a mysterious way . In what may have
been experienced earliest by the great
pagan philosophers , an essential contemplation
of life that we lack so much today .

You're
very informative as always , but the differences you see
are an insight to me of some of the limitations of
your reasoning ...you intentionally steer away from
the aspect of each man ( Siddartha/Aristotle)
uncovering the need for establishing a center
( equilibrium) to our varied states being
for there to be any consistent cognizance of that
extensive being at all. Or that fulfillment
of Self in the Dharma/Order/relationship between
the dynamics of the inner and outer
worlds of phenomena , mind , conciousness, and nature
mixed within us.

What is possible for man to see or intuit is as much proportionate for us , as is our ability for us to rule our passions and desires when engaging the world .
For in knowing our Selves , we at some point
must be the observer.

One detaches , one observes , one listens , one pays attention, one intuits one cares deeply enough....
and ------> one learns many new novel things .<g>
This is how science , mathematics, astronomy ,
philosophy & all the arts are born ,
and our most startling awareness of discovery of the energies of Self/Being .

Siddartha said know thyself and be real in fulfilling your part in this order/Dharma,follow the Middle Way & act reasonably.
Aristotle said everything in moderation , seek virtue
of reason over excess that leads to deficiency .

Defeciency of what , Neo ? Of insight ,clarity
or reason and gradually opening up
to the experience of the
order of being ?

;-)

PS: for a pagan Aristotle seemed to cover quite a bit of ground . Know thyself ...or know your "Being "!

Dasein....



To: Neocon who wrote (15177)6/1/2001 7:00:57 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
" Aristotle's direct influence was Plato..."

Yes I can gather that is true , for Plato was
his teacher. Much in the same way the apostle John would have been influenced by Jesus Christ the "Hero " in the drama/tragedy/play we know as the "gospels " ,
was his teacher as well .

Therefore influenced him....

And " know thyself " , i think is what
he taught him , humilty
and moderation.

recurring themes they seem to be , but much distorted
in that middle eastern lands where mystics ,magicians ,
messiahs and wizards wandered
ascetically in the deserts ...

we owe much to the Hellenes... who borrowed some from the Persians , who borrowed some from the Assyrians
and from the Babylonians and from
Egyptians back back to ?

;-)



To: Neocon who wrote (15177)6/1/2001 7:17:29 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
The Middle Way primarily addresses Siddharta's experience with extreme asceticism, and his realization that that too was a form of attachment, by over- emphasizing the importance of
the material world.


Please let us not forget that Siddartha for the
first 33 yrs of his life was not an ascetic.
He was born into royalty with all the privileges
and finest extensive education
of his time .

much like your Aquinas...so he drew from the vantage
points of both worlds . He was well grounded in meditation
which is the chief tool of all who were
wise to follow.

You seem to think that the Dharmic road to Nirvanna
is only a passionless one for some reason .
The Tibetan Buddhist , the Dalai Lama ...does he seem
passionless to you Neo?

Man becoming detached from many of his own neurosis
and addictions and attempting to be an
original/ virtuous/compassionate/ participant
in his own experience/Life and the discovery of compassion
and reason, can tend in the end to offer moments
of supreme satisfaction and insights that
can be some of the most thrilling & fulfilling.<g>

(tastes great , less filling ---> for Gao Seng)

All things being equal ....the sense of sight
next to the sense of feeling ,and the experience of
insight/wisdom is basically shared by
the atheist, agnostic, believer, peasant, king, emperor
pope, messiah , prophet ... learning to use these
powerful facilities is as good a place
to start as any.

First causes & being
and all that....

;-)