Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TechTrader42 who wrote (8406)	6/1/2001 10:41:11 PM
From: Joseph Silent	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Imaginary numbers .... :) I am waiting to see the market indices expressed in terms of the square root of minus 1. J :)

To: TechTrader42 who wrote (8406)	6/1/2001 11:34:47 PM
From: Chris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

i wouldnt be surprised to see qqq at 46-47 next week (to hit my downward trendline from nov 00) thats when ill really feel comfortable shorting qqq. not now, because im still on the lower end of the trading range (44-51) (ie: risk/reward)

To: TechTrader42 who wrote (8406)	6/1/2001 11:49:49 PM
From: Chris	Respond to of 52237

to you: qqq levels corrected Message 15884545

To: TechTrader42 who wrote (8406)	6/2/2001 12:53:37 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 52237

Naw, ya got all wrong. The puters that run the whole thing are up in Greenwich. They were the ones that got repoed by the wire houses when they took over LTCM. Much nicer lunch spots available in the neighborhood. Besides, the FOMC got so spooked by that episode that the keep the Plunge Protection Team on permanent call just around the corner at the atheletic club. Conspiracy + Connecticut = CO2 Coincidence? You be the judge. Now about "The randomness may be due only to repeated power and equipment failures." We must be careful, especially in view of the California energy situation to distinguish between failures and someone turning off the switch. IMVHO, at times of market frenzy, the failure of Internet trading may well be a "planned outage" and not a failure at all. The failure is the lack of whizdumb on the part of the retail patzer to know that the floor trading on the NYSE is never interrupted by the burstiness of the Internet, nor are the antics of the market makers on the four-letter stocks subject to the insults of the public internet. Nay, they're on private intranets that, son of gun, actually work in a time of crisis. Unlike the pabulum proximations of paradise we get fed. And if I weren't so fed up, I'd be deeply cynical. BWDIK, Ray ;)