Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (74077)	6/1/2001 9:10:51 PM
From: Bilow	Respond to of 93625

Hi Sun Tzu; Re Nicolo Machiavelli's The Prince. It's a great book, but I think that the analysis of why Infineon did what they did is from Yahoo, where the Jack Robertson article was being talked about long before it showed up here. (LOL!!!) Wish I could take credit for the analysis, but most of it was in the Robertson article, and the rest was from here: LOUMFSG, Yahoo RMBS thread, I am not sure what to make of this. Since Infineon appears to have the right pursue this later, maybe they are only backing off now as a way of minimizing legal costs. If Payne's Markman ruling is not overturned, then the becomes moot. messages.yahoo.com -- Carl

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (74077)	6/1/2001 9:11:13 PM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Sun... How about... "why should they ask for patents to be overturned?"... maybe the cost is not as great as Bilow thinks, and maybe it would help to solidify IFX's position in a Rambus appeal. As far as Micron is concerned... these guys have been scratching each others backs right along... why stop now? Never know when you're going to need a good scratch in return.