SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Whist who wrote (9233)6/2/2001 12:56:46 PM
From: John Lacelle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
flap,

You are right about Rush's attack on Chelsea being over the line. But
then I hope you are man enough to admit that the liberal media was a
bunch of worms when they brought Dan Quail's 13 year old daughter
into the abortion debate. That was as sick as it gets, IMHO.

-John



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (9233)6/2/2001 1:00:47 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
Saying something doesn't make it true. We've found that out numerous times from Clintonista's haven't we flap? Patricia's source or memory is flawed. And your willingness to believe anything someone says negative about Limbaugh is predictable.

Hate, class divisiveness, race baiting, and an idiologically driven inability to deal with political differences flows from the Democratic party.

Just because someone disagrees with your radical left wing socialist agenda doesn't make them evil, the antichrist, or any other nasty verbage you wish to spill.

Democratic henchmen from the mainstream press, have said far worse about Bush's children in less than 4 months, then Limbaugh ever said in 8 years about Chelsea.

You and your ilk simply lack a sense of humor and can't deal with political satire when it's pointed toward you. Dish it out with a vengeance, but whine and whine when it comes back at you has been your standard operating procedure.



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (9233)6/4/2001 11:00:18 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 59480
 
I don't think that's correct. Limbaugh might have held Hillary up as the WH dog, but not Chelsea. But what the hell, you can keep saying it was Chelsea if it helps your story...



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (9233)6/4/2001 2:44:21 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
You say I am wrong about Limbo attacking Chelsea but offer no supporting evidence. You're getting as lazy as Limbo. It's easy to rebut,
much more difficult to refute.

How is that? He would have to produce transcripts of EVERY Limbaugh broadcast during the Slick administration and somehow show there were no Chelsea slams in them.

You only have to produce ONE where there is such. DO SO!

En Garde, Sir!