SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Howard R. Hansen who wrote (20394)6/5/2001 3:31:25 AM
From: Andre Williamson  Respond to of 60323
 
Howard -

NiMHs have worked great for me in my digital camera - especially after burning through a couple of sets of alkalines in next to no time. But because they're rechargeables, I'd think they naturally lose some of their power every day (for other types of rechargeables I've read a natural charge loss of about 1% a day), which means that they're not ideal for long-term use in devices where energy usage is low, items which are used infrequently, or items where reliability is crucial (your remote controls, for instance, or a flashlight).

However, in my experience they're perfect for higher drain devices used frequently - you just get in the habit of recharging them.

Andre



To: Howard R. Hansen who wrote (20394)6/5/2001 8:20:53 AM
From: Ausdauer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Howard,

My first digicam chewed through a brand new set (4) of Duracell batteries
in less than 5 minutes. I couldn't believe it! Now I have several sets of NiMH
chargeables that I rotate through service. I also bought a portable charger that
is about the size of a Palm pilot. Kodak sells this type of kit, as do many
others, but I believe they are made by a single manufacturer.

Aus



To: Howard R. Hansen who wrote (20394)6/5/2001 9:41:14 AM
From: Ray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
In high drain applications, NiMH batteries are far better than alkaline cells -- and other rechargeable batteries as well. But, for such things as TV remotes, alkaline batteries are better as they have low leakage currents; and there is little to be gained by using rechargeables where alkalines last for a year or more.

While NiMH batteries have recently improved quite a bit in leakage, they should be re-charged every month or so. NiMH batteries can be charged rapidly, if you buy a "smart" charger that throttles the charging current as the battery approaches full charge.

Here is a good source for NiMH batteries and chargers, with relatively much information too:

thomas-distributing.com



To: Howard R. Hansen who wrote (20394)6/5/2001 10:23:25 AM
From: SBHX  Respond to of 60323
 
Howard,

I should have qualified that. The NiMH lasts 4x as long as alkaline on digital cameras. On other low drain systems, they may not do as well. They also slowly discharge when idle.

But for digital cameras,my experience is that a fresh charged NiMH does take 4x as many pictures as a duracell alkaline.

SbH