SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ColtonGang who wrote (150960)6/5/2001 4:10:18 AM
From: ColtonGang  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Fla. Vote Rife With Disparities, Study Says
Rights Panel Finds Blacks Penalized
President Bush greets park rangers with his brother, Fla. Gov. Jeb Bush, while touring the Everglades Monday. (AFP Photo)








)














By Robert E. Pierre and Peter Slevin
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, June 5, 2001; Page A01

Florida's conduct of the 2000 presidential election was marked by "injustice, ineptitude and inefficiency" that unfairly penalized minority voters, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has concluded in a report that criticizes top state officials -- particularly Gov. Jeb Bush and Secretary of State Katherine Harris -- for allowing disparate treatment of voters.

Unequal access to modern voting equipment and "overzealous efforts" to purge state voter lists most harshly affected African Americans in the state that decided the November election for President Bush, the commission declared in a 167-page final draft report obtained by The Washington Post. The inquiry found no "conclusive evidence" that officials "conspired" to disenfranchise minority and disabled voters.

Fifty-four percent of votes rejected during the Florida election were cast by black voters, according to the report, scheduled for a commission vote Friday. African Americans accounted for 11 percent of voters statewide.

"The disenfranchisement was not isolated or episodic. State officials failed to fulfill their duties in a manner that would prevent this disenfranchisement," said the report, the product of a six-month investigation. "Despite the closeness of the election, it was widespread voter disenfranchisement and not the dead-heat contest that was the extraordinary feature in the Florida election."

The commission -- composed of four Democrats, three independents and one Republican -- is poised to ask the U.S. Department of Justice and the Florida attorney general's office to investigate whether federal or state civil rights laws were violated.

The commission is charged with investigating possible violations -- intentional or unintentional -- of the federal Voting Rights Act and other civil rights protections.

Advisers to Gov. Bush and Harris were angered yesterday by the report's early release. Harris's spokesman, David Host, called the leak "both fraudulent and shameful" because Harris's response is not due until later this week.

"The commission had issued a preliminary report several months ago and was unable to find any evidence of intentional discrimination in the conduct of the November election," said Katie Baur, the governor's communications director. "Since that report, the governor has signed into law one of the most progressive election reform bills in the nation. We will have no further comment until our office receives a copy of the final report."

The Florida attorney general's office is investigating "possible civil rights violations stemming from the election," spokesman Joe Bizzaro said yesterday. "We're going to give due consideration to whatever is requested by the commission."

Florida's election problems have been scrutinized since Election Day. A bipartisan task force appointed by Gov. Bush concluded that the November election was marred by systemic inconsistencies. That report cited unreliable voting machines, improper counting of absentee ballots and inaccurate databases that allowed unregistered voters to vote while preventing legal voters from casting ballots.

A computer analysis by The Post showed that the more black and Democratic a precinct, the more likely it was to suffer high rates of invalidated votes.

No inquiry so far has been as broad as that conducted by the commission -- or as specifically focused on the rights of minorities. The commission held three days of hearings, interviewed 100 witnesses and reviewed 118,000 documents.

Some of the key findings:

• African Americans were nearly 10 times as likely as whites to have their ballots rejected. Poor counties populated by minorities were more likely to use voting systems that rejected larger percentages of ballots than more affluent counties.

• Some Hispanic and Haitian voters were not provided ballots in their native languages, and physical barriers sometimes kept disabled voters from entering polling sites.

• There were no clear guidelines to protect eligible voters from being wrongly removed as part of a statewide purge of felons, people with dual registrations and the deceased.

• Elections supervisors in the counties with the worst problems failed to "prepare adequately" for the election or demand adequate resources.

• The Florida Division of Elections failed to educate Florida's residents on the mechanics of voting.

The report, and its executive summary, were particularly critical of the roles played by Gov. Bush and Harris. Bush was chided for a failure of leadership -- for example, rejecting a $100,000 budget request for voter education. Harris was criticized for claiming that she had only a "ministerial" responsibility for elections.

"While she described her role in the policies and decisions affecting the actual voting as limited, she asserted ultimate authority in determining the outcome of the vote count," the report said.

R. Doug Lewis, director of the Houston-based Election Center, said Harris and Bush had limited control over the 67 county supervisors. The commission showed "a lack of understanding about how the process works," he said.

"In all fairness to Secretary Harris and all other secretaries of state, until state legislatures give them very specific authority for enforcing actions over local authorities, there is no legal basis for them to do it."

NAACP President Kweisi Mfume said the report supports the complaints of minority voters.

"The report underscores officially what most of us have known all along," Mfume said. "Not only was there widespread disenfranchisement, there was also a kind of widespread acceptance that the less done about it the better."



To: ColtonGang who wrote (150960)6/5/2001 1:34:24 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 769670
 
Government greed ruins lives, ruins portfolios, and ruins Europeans chance for broadband wireless communications for a generation:

Europe's Telecom Firms Paid Billions For '3G' Licenses, Costs Still Loom

By ALMAR LATOUR
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
.
.
.
For Europe's governments, 3G also promised to produce a revenue windfall. In Britain, communications regulators consulted two professors, Ken Binmore and Paul Klemperer, among others, on how to auction licenses for radio spectrum to operate 3G services. The duo used game theory to create an elaborate auction process under which several licenses could be sold simultaneously.

The professors designed the auction in such a way that the proceeds for the government would be maximized: Five licenses were to be auctioned off at the same time. Of those, four could be expected to go to incumbents, which each more or less needed to survive in their home market. The remaining fifth license could go to a new entrant -- and would drive the bidding process because it would attract newcomers eager to step in.
.
.
.
It wasn't until round 94, nearly four weeks after the start of the auction, that the first of the 13 bidders dropped out, at a price level of more than$3 billion. Four other bidders followed shortly thereafter, leaving eight bidders for five licenses.

At round 150, France Telecom SA gave up and five winners were left: Deutsche Telekom's one2one, Hutchison Whampoa Ltd., Orange SA, BTand Vodafone Group PLC. Hutchison subsequently sold 20% of its license to DoCoMo and 15% to KPN, while Orange was acquired by FranceTelecom, which in that way secured a UK license of its own after theprocess. "1 billion pounds or 10 billion pounds, the psychology is thesame," says Mr. Klemperer. "These bidders wanted a license at any cost."

From the government's point of view, their theories worked magnificently: The auction of five licenses last July brought in a total of $34 billion, more than seven times what was originally expected.

When other European countries saw how much money Britain had raked in, some of them came up with similar rules for their own auctions. If these licenses were so precious, politicians reasoned, phone companies should pay accordingly. The phone companies, figuring they couldn't afford not to be part of the 3G revolution, duly bid each other up higher and higher. In Germany alone, six licenses were auctioned for a total of $45 billion.
.
.
.
As plans moved forward, European business leaders and politicians could barely stop gloating. For once, the Old World appeared to be leading the U.S. in the development of an important new technology. Mobile telephony, they said, would create a brave new wireless world and perhaps even give birth to an economic miracle. President Clinton warned that unless U.S. tech companies quickly got involved in 3G, there would be a wireless gap.
.
.
.
Now logic is being reasserted, sometimes brutally. KPN, which paid 8.9 billion euros ($7.5 billion) for licenses, has slashed its work force by 8,000, or 19%, to help cut costs. Its shares are off nearly 88% since their peak in March last year, and the company is considering going back to shareholders to raise more cash.

Germany's Deutsche Telekom AG shelled out nearly 16 billion euros for licenses, helping swell its debt 53% in the past year to 56.8 billion euros. Its stock has tumbled 70% since its high last March.

Institutional shareholders of British Telecom, meanwhile, indignant at the 67% drop in BT's share price since early last year and alarmed by the company's debt of 28 billion British pounds ($19.8 billion), have pressured BT into abandoning its dream of becoming a global operator.

interactive2.wsj.com

From the government's point of view, their theories worked magnificently: - Get the money,

DAMN the consequences for the companies, employees, consumers, and owners.

Just GET THE MONEY.

Clinton's just pissed the US Treasure didn't join in the plunder.