Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (16385)	6/11/2001 8:27:47 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Here's an interesting follow-up on Sudan from the Post. <<In a civil war that seems to be fueled by so much -- religion, for example, because one side is Muslim and the other side is not, and race, because one side is Arab and the other African -- nothing has supercharged the fighting in southern Sudan quite like Nile Blend crude.>> washingtonpost.com

To: The Philosopher who wrote (16385)	6/13/2001 4:25:11 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 82486

he probably killed fewer people than a single raid on Germany in WW II, and certainly nothing compared to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. If you view his "war" as being as justified as WWII then maybe you have a point but I don't. As for Nagasaki and Hiroshima they where not the most distructive events in WWII. The fire bombing of Tokyo killed more people, and Dresden and Hamburg probably killed less but much more then a small fraction of the atomic bombs drops. The Tokyo attack was over a two day period with a lot of planes and it did not kill a lot more then the atomic bomb drops but it did kill more. learningcurve.pro.gov.uk nd.edu (I don't agree with the conclutions of this site but it has seemingly accurate info) albanyacademyforgirls.org Tim