SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lorne who wrote (71550)6/12/2001 8:02:05 AM
From: lorne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116779
 
Merrill Lynch hikes gold trading range forecast to $260-295/oz
Jun. 11-MAR--
New York, June 11 (BridgeNews) - Merrill Lynch has raised its
forecasted near-term trading range for gold to $260-295 an ounce from
$250-290, saying that recent developments might allow for a slightly
higher trading range.
Merrill Lynch said it is even more confident that the September 1999 low
at $252 will not be violated this year.
* * *
Bill O'Neill, director of futures research for Merrill Lynch,
cautioned that he was not forecasting any major shifts to prosperity for
gold bugs.
Full story >>>
futuresource.com



To: lorne who wrote (71550)6/12/2001 11:44:03 AM
From: marek_wojna  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116779
 
<<Gold Leasing/Hedging/Forward sales.>>

What strikes me reading this kind of articles is that thousands of miners around the world lost their jobs not because of market condition, lack of demand, but strictly due to the arrogance of governments, corrupt companies like Barrick, Anglo, gurus of "new" economy. Many of those jobs were lost in countries where no other jobs around exist. Add the investors who lost money and the picture is getting ugly.



To: lorne who wrote (71550)6/12/2001 12:41:56 PM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116779
 
" Additionally, one should purchase gold mines that have few or no forward sales. The following is a brief list of such mines, "
Full story: egoli.com.au

In my opinion, Homestake should not be on that list. They have 10% of reserves hedged.
75% in $AUS at an equivalent of $US265, below current spot.