Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (16796)	6/15/2001 10:13:03 AM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

As I recall, there were many technical problems with the passage, one of which is that it was never ratified. There is a lot of noise on the subject, and it will take some time to filter it out to present a sound case. For instance, there seems to be some association with how the amendment was passed and a discrepency in Ohio's attainment of statehood in 1803. Is it true Ohio was made a state retroactive to 1803 in 1954? And there is this sort of attack as well: The coexistence of the personal income tax and The Bill of Rights ia an impossiibility. to give just one example,in an audit, confiscation form 1040 will be used against you. By being forced to filll out this form,you are giving evidence against yourself,a clear violation of the fifth amendment.