Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (17135)	6/19/2001 8:59:49 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

You said that the statistics showed no such danger to women!! My quote: "the statistics show very clearly...the religious opposition was not reducing abortions, but only endangering mothers". YOU!! "The statistics show no such thing."!! Your claim was just as you restate "the religious opposition was not reduceing abortions, but only endagering mothers". I replied that The statistics show no such thing and they don't. They don't show that that religious opposition did not reduce abortions. I claimed that the stats do not show both A - religious opposition does not reduce abortions, and B - That it just endangers women. Then you assert that I said C "that illegal abortions present no danger to women." C does not equal the combination of both A and B. Its not even the same as either of them specifically (particuarly A). Tim Edit - I't 9 PM and I'm still sitting at a PC At work responding to your posts... I'm going home now. I might continue this tommorow or maybe not... Tim