Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: foundation who wrote (11833)	6/20/2001 7:18:31 AM
From: foundation	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196656

U.S. operators hold 3G advantage - analyst By Elizabeth Biddlecombe, Total Telecom 20 June 2001 U.S. wireless operators could fair better than their European counterparts in a 3G market, according to David Cleevely, managing director of Cambridge, U.K.-based Analysys Consulting. Speaking at a Palo Alto, California briefing, Cleevely pointed out that at around US$4.2 per MHz per head, U.S. mobile carriers had paid (in recent auctions) an equivalent average price for spectrum to that paid for Europe's most expensive 3G licenses. Prices paid in the U.K. and Germany were around $3.8 and $4.4 per MHz per head respectively. These prices were paid despite average mobile penetration levels in the U.S. of around 40%, which are on a par with some countries in Eastern Europe. And many observers predict that the penetration level will settle at about 60% come 2004 or 2005. Penetration in Western Europe is currently around 70%. But Cleevely believes U.S. operators will make more from their customer base because business users predominate in the U.S. market. "The U.S. is more data-centric and business-focused," he said. "I'm not sure that European business users are as switched on as they are in the U.S." Noting that e-mail will be a popular service with this user base, he added that, "the U.S. is in a better position than people recognise [and operators are] in a better position to sustain costs." On the topic of minimising costs through the sharing of networks, he warned that operators will not find the practicalities of such arrangements very straightforward. "You need to accept assumptions about co-operating with someone else. Also, the logical handovers [as the user roams from owned cells to shared cells to the competitor's cell and back to the home network, for instance] are quite complicated." This is in addition to the regulatory issues. As for the role of national regulators in ensuring that 3G is not a disaster that results in operator bankruptcy, Cleevely stated that in his view, "auctions are an abdication of responsibility. Regulators can't say that auctions are the best way to deal with [spectrum allocation] and then offload it onto the market," he said. "They have a duty of care to think about how the market will develop". He drew a parallel with copyright, which "shapes industries even though it is just a legal device for the protection of intellectual property. Regulators are shaping how the market develops, like it or not." The FCC was not available for comment in time for this article. totaltele.com