Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (137708)	6/20/2001 10:03:10 AM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

John, RE: They enforce laws, but they also establish rules based on ethics. I do not see anything in Osha's writings that go against any rules of ethics, whether it is the SEC's rules or Emily Post's rules. Osha's actions may be libelous, accusing Intel of improper business practices. Huh? It might not be a smart practice, but it certainly is legal. In addition, it is quite possible for Intel's customers to be ordering more inventory than normal because they expect a pickup in demand. That would also be consistent with Osha's comments. Isn't it possible that Intel management is mistaken when they perceive that they have gained market share? What the heck is the SEC for, if not to hear shareholder concerns? Shareholder concerns are best addressed to the company concerned. "The primary mission of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities markets. I don't see anything in Osha's comments that would be relevant.