SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (17184)6/20/2001 1:19:27 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
"Seems to me that if a man and woman have sex but agree they don't want children, and they take measures, but the measures fail, and she gets pregnant, she has all the right to decide whether or not the child is born, he has none, and if she decides it is to be born he has no option but to pay about, in this state for average parents, at least $150,000 over the next 18 years for child she said she didn't want and he clearly didn't want, but she has all the decision power and he has none."

What if the woman is a prostitute?



To: The Philosopher who wrote (17184)6/20/2001 2:23:28 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"IMO there is something more than vaguely wrong with this picture."

Oh yeah, here it is "...have sex but..."

I know everybody would prefer to find a way out of responsibility for their carnality but its never going to work out. There is no right side in this scenario.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News