SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (12882)6/20/2001 6:02:08 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34857
 
I appreciate the academic dissertation. And I really do get it, more or less. My interest, however, is not academic unless it affects an investment. In that sense, no one has bothered to answer my question:

Why, after suggesting that HSCSD fills in GPRS's gaps, did Nokia reduce the speed for HSCSD down to 14 kbps by inserting error correction which it did not previously have, as appears to be the case in the translation from the German Nokia site Eric posted? Is it because, as you and Nokia have stated, errors in the transmission of data are unacceptable? Did the handoff difficulties play a part in the decision? I intuitively suspect that handoff is probably the time at which errors occur most frequently, but what the hell do I know, right?

I assume that my understanding of the German Nokia web page translation posted by Eric is correct. It's definitely not the best. I understand it to mean that with error correction in place, HSCSD is slowed down to 14.4 kbps. I think I'm correct in my thinking that if error correction is not used, as was originally envisioned for HSCSD, the data rate increases but its reliability decreases. And that, according to you and Nokia, is unacceptable. If unacceptable, how can HSCSD be ethically marketed without error correction to corporate users [buy this! It's fast!] who need error-free data transmission [sell/buy, account numbers, EKG, etc.]?

The other unanswered business question that no one has bothered to answer is this: If my understanding that data transfer rates for error-corrected HSCSD are in the 14.4 vicinity, max, is correct, what business case can be made for corporate users to be charged more for a lousy 5 kbps of increased speed? I assume that the higher rates are uncorrected and therefore unacceptable. I haven't yet seen any carrier that offers more than 14.4 kbps speed with error correction. However, I haven't looked at every internet entry for HSCSD, and don't intend to, so correct me if I'm wrong, though I don't think I am. My understanding of the German translation or your barely comprehensible posts might also be faulty. No offense will be taken.

My intuition leads me to a couple of preliminary opinions which of course are subject to correction. Firstly, HSCSD cannot or, perhaps better, should not be marketed to business users without error correction. Second, with error correction in place, the data transfer rate according to the Nokia German site for this fine piece of souped-up GSM is a mere 5 additional kbps, a rate which does not justify its higher cost to the user. Ergo, HSCSD's business case is faulty. If I'm wrong, I'll listen and admit it. But please don't respond with an academic puff-piece.

I know. I'm like a dog with bone. However, I was unfairly chastised and insulted, even after offering an apology for my rudeness [pimping], so I want to see what you really know about the issues that interest me as an investor. So far, I've gotten a lot of irrelevant academic talk, the bare-bones rudiments of which I already had a dim understanding. No one, including Eric, seems to have any answers to my questions [I certainly don't] even though the attitudes taken certainly suggest superior knowledge and wisdom. So, show me the money.