SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (18426)6/20/2001 10:35:54 PM
From: TREND1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Zeev
If you have time, take a look at LU for buying at bottom of channel and selling at the top of the channel.
It is in a DOWN channel, but the large volume may make
it worth while.

Note the RECOVERY FACTOR, if mistake is made on entry
due to sine wave formation.

Larry Dudash



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (18426)6/21/2001 12:21:03 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 30051
 
TheStandard.com

Semi-Dilemma

By Steve Ginsberg

Chip stocks have long presented a sticky problem: No tech portfolio is complete without them, but unless you're a chip engineer, it's all but impossible to follow the cardinal rule of putting your money into companies you know something about.

Moreover, the best opportunities for such stocks come up when the tech sector is near its bottom: Chips are usually the first to benefit from an upturn because of the time required to make them. Companies that need chips have to start buying at the earliest signs of an economic recovery.

Recently, chip stocks have been rising. The Philadelphia Semiconductor index is up 38 percent since early April, above the 32 percent climb in the Nasdaq. Wall Street watchers seem split on whether this rally is premature or whether this is the time to buy.

One indicator is the book-to-bill ratio. Many chip companies stopped disclosing their ratios, so investors watch the book-to-bill for chip-equipment makers. If equipment makers like Applied Materials book more than they actually ship, that's a good sign of future growth and a time to buy, according to Morningstar analyst Jeremy Lopez.

But that's not what's happening now. In April, $712 million of chip-equipment orders came in industrywide and $1.16 billion worth was shipped, for a book-to-bill ratio of 0.42. That means 42 cents of new orders came in for every $1 shipped - the lowest ratio in a decade. Usually, the ratio will rise before stocks rebound, but this time the Philadelphia Semiconductor index is rising first, a sign that the rally may be premature.

Analysts and traders watch figures such as spot market prices for chips to gauge short-term movements. Long-term investors can check 10-Q filings for chip sales and even basic measures such as price-to-earnings ratios. The P/Es of most chip companies are disconcertingly high, given the continued drop-off in the book-to-bill ratio. Intel's forward P/E is 30, above the S&P 500's P/E of 22. The P/Es of Applied Materials and network chipmakers PMC-Sierra and Broadcom are 40, 57 and 80, respectively. If demand for chips hasn't bottomed out, the sector could see more selling.

Investors also have to decide what to buy. In market segments where there is less room for innovation, like in memory, chips move like commodities. "For commodity chips the pricing is more volatile, and you need a crystal ball to see where prices are going," says Lopez. "For long-term investors, I would stray away from those."

Companies that have a technical edge in a specific niche tethered to blue-chip customers are the choice for Jesse Soto, senior analyst at Highmark Capital Management. He likes RF Micro Devices because it's taken a lead in modular designs for semiconductor components in wireless devices.

"When all things are bad, all companies are bad," says Soto. "But when they rebound, put your money in companies that are tied to the winning horses."

Steve Ginsberg is a writer in San Francisco.

(magazine)

biz.yahoo.com
Ö¿Ö



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (18426)6/21/2001 3:13:31 AM
From: Sam  Respond to of 30051
 
Zeev,
Intel's $7.5b for this year looks like it's carved in stone, but next year looks like a different story.

Weak market may cause Intel cuts
By Reuters
June 20, 2001, 11:45 a.m. PT
LONDON--U.S. semiconductor maker Intel said Wednesday it needed to see a recovery in the chip
market within six months or it would consider cutting capacity and investments next year.

Intel Chief Executive Craig Barrett, traveling through Europe this week, also said delays in building
factories in Israel and Ireland would not affect Intel's $7.5 billion investment plans this year, but could
affect next year's budget.

The U.S. company, by far the world's largest chipmaker, stands out as the only semiconductor maker that
has so far stuck to its investment plans, both in research as well as new factories and equipment.

Alongside its investments in new factories, Intel has also said it would invest $4.2 billion in research and
development.

"We haven't changed guidance (to spend $7.5 billion in capital expenditure). But the slowdown has
modulated demand somewhat. If the slowdown hadn't occurred, we might have spent more," Barrett told
journalists here.

"My expectation is we'll watch what goes on in the next three to six months, and then if we don't see any
improvement at that time, we'll seriously look at both the installed infrastructure we have plus what we
want to spend on investment next year," Barrett added.

In Israel, Intel has put off a decision on a $3.5 billion chip plant, while in March it suspended construction
of a $2.2 billion facility in Ireland, which may come back on stream in 2002, depending on demand.

Despite cascading profit warnings from rival chipmakers in recent days, Barrett saw no reason to revisit
Intel's midterm business update, made nearly two weeks ago.

Intel's update caused a sigh of relief when investors learned the company stood by an earlier second
quarter sales forecast of between $6.2 and $6.8 billion, down from $8.3 billion a year ago.

Intel at a "stable bottom"
Barrett confirmed that the core of Intel's business, which comes from computer-related products such as
microprocessors and motherboards, still looks stable, albeit at lower levels.

"We perceive that we're at a stable bottom of this trough. We're looking for some seasonality in the second
half, which should give some uptick. We're kind of bouncing along at what we perceive as the bottom at
this stage," he said.

But he also said the economic slowdown was hurting the launch of the new Pentium 4 microprocessor,
which was quickly discounted after introduction in an attempt to bolster sales.

"I wouldn't disagree that the economic slowdown has impacted the ramp of Pentium 4, and even sales in
the entire computer industry," Barrett said.

The upbeat market reaction to Intel's midterm update was the result of very low expectations for an
industry that is in its worst-ever slump. It has been quickly overshadowed by a host of profit warnings
from chip and telecommunications-equipment makers, which say European customers have capped
purchases, in line with their U.S. counterparts.

In just seven trading days, the Dow Jones European Technology Stoxx Index has fallen 21 percent from
560 points to 440 points in the wake of warnings from Finnish mobile phone maker Nokia, Canada's
telecommunications-equipment maker Nortel Networks and German chipmaker Infineon Technologies.

Intel shrugged off some of that sell-off, but has nevertheless shed 13 percent, to $26.85, since its update
June 7.

However, Barrett suggested that rival chipmakers that had warned in recent days were finally coming
around to accepting the decline in revenues that Intel had predicted many months ago.

"I'm not sure our forecasts are that different from other people. A year ago our revenue was up in the $8
billion plus range. The guidance we gave two weeks ago was that it was going to be in the $6 billion range.
To me that's a pretty substantial drop," Barrett said.

The fact that competitors were now predicting sales declines similar to Intel's lent some support to the U.S.
group's heavily criticized forecasting unit, which forced the company to come out with a string of
warnings last year.

Barrett came to its defense when he said no one had expected the severity of the decline when it hit late last
year.

Meanwhile, Intel had a reasonably clear outlook on its core computer business, which generates some 80
percent of revenues, thanks to the maturity of that industry, which has gone through many downturns and
improved its inventories management.

"The computer industry is relatively stable from an inventory standpoint and a sales-out standpoint. We
have good insight into the inventories that our big customers have. There doesn't seem to be a stack-up,"
Barrett said.

Intel's much smaller business for communications components, which generates the remaining 20 percent
of sales through products such as opto-electronic chips and flash memory for cell phones, was in dire
shape.

"The communications side of the business is still in a dreadful state of flux. Cisco and Nortel are very
good customers of ours, and when they say they have many, many months of inventory on hand of our
products, we have some exposure." "The good news is that that part of our business is only 20 percent of
business at this time," Barrett said.

Story Copyright © 2001 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (18426)6/21/2001 3:43:14 AM
From: GTC Trader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
<< The best sign that a sock will lead the next advance >>

Zeev,

It is late, I am tired, and maybe I am misunderstanding your point, but did you just predict that a SOCK will lead the next advance ???

I really don't understand the stock market at all !!!

GGG - GTC



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (18426)6/21/2001 5:49:48 AM
From: GTC Trader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Zeev,

The following post Message 15972733
gives a link to a short article on gold which is quite interesting.
gold-eagle.com
I would be very interested in what you think of their arguments.

They point out the rising equities Put/Call ratio as a sign of extreme negative sentiment, and they expect both the SP500 and Gold/Gold Stocks to rally together.

They also talk about liquidity driving the markets up for the rest of the year, much like you predict.

Your comments would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks - Ken