Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (19240)	6/28/2001 8:10:33 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 30051

There are more than one way to look at a chart. One way look at the behavior is in the form of "Boxes", the support of prior boxes becomes resistance to lower boxes. The 2052/2078 area has served as support for the retracement of the April May advance for quite some time. its breach gave you a sell signal, my sell signal came much earlier, because the 2250 was the bottom of an earlier box (The January Lows), and the failure to get above and stay above coupled with non chart parameters, provided that signal. The market also achieved the target set early April when we just started that rally (first target was 2160 and then 2250, and then 2388, the last we did not get, but if you look at the chart, we were returned back from the first two areas). Our closing above 2078, coupled once more with additional parameters (particularly some unique cycles, including a cycle related to the one that prompted me to call "2050 before June expiry" last month), indicates to me that the current break will be sustainable. At what point are you going to give a new buy signal or a new sell signal (right now, I understand you are "Neutral"), will that be just be a price target, a time target or a combination of a number of parameters? Zeev

To: TREND1 who wrote (19240)	6/28/2001 8:46:24 PM
From: Kailash	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Master Larry -- precisely my point too. I don't see any reason so far to believe we've broken the down channel. Zeev is a vacillator, a wobbler, a shillyshallyer, and prides himself on it <ggg>. He smells out the future but he jumps the gun. The market will teach him (or clobber us on the head) <g>. A week from now we'll be hitting 1850, pie in our faces, whipsawed, trapped by the paper bull, fooled by impatience. All this in jest, of course; nobody knows what trouble we'll see. Kailash