Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (3905)	6/29/2001 3:49:03 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Your post is non-responsive.... You said: I can name a bunch of reasons why Canada and the UK are unfree relative to the U.S. I responded: Go ahead, no one is stopping you. I'm pretty excited that you must have some information that is reported under the same standard and to the same degree of honesty. If you think that the second amendment guarantees an unrestricted freedom to bear arms, you should read. United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) (USSC+) jttmab

To: ManyMoose who wrote (3905)	6/29/2001 5:36:04 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

BTW. If by some remote chance you happen to read US vs. Miller and want to toss back Orin Hatchs' subcomittee report on the 2nd amendment or some NRA consitutional scholars paper on the matter, don't bother it's already been done. I've also been given the English teacher's grammatical breakdown of the second amendment. That was a real joke. So if that's the tact you want to take, save your time and mine. If you've got another ruling that overturns US vs. Miller, that would be fine. No one else has been able to find one. Perhaps you'll be lucky. jttmab