Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sergiotenenbaum who wrote (75224)	7/1/2001 1:54:06 PM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Hello ST, Are you suggesting that Mr. Bilow should introduce the evidence on the monopoly issues that IFX was unable to Maybe Bilow will do great, the actual damages claimed on those counts were attorney’s fees, and by now we know that they are certainly rich. I'm just suggesting that we will get more news about the evidence in the MU case, whatever it is, from CB than we will from any other poster on this BB. As best I can tell, there are two posters at TMF who can compete with the level of information he provides. Certainly there is no one here who does so. If that pattern continues, this will be true, whether the attorneys in RMBS v. IFX are rich or not. 0\|0 P.S. I don't know if the RMBS attorneys are "rich" but from where I sit they certainly have far greater justification for their earnings than G. Tate has for his.