Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NightOwl who wrote (75226)	7/1/2001 3:03:26 PM
From: sergiotenenbaum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Hello NightOwl, When I said rich, I meant the attorney’s fees, not the attorneys themselves. It is one thing to get a fraud verdict on (alleged by RMBS) wrong jury instructions for a) keeping silent during JEDEC meetings which raises the issue of “reliance”, and b) modifying patents to fit SRAM specifications (RMBS alleges that this is legal if they originate from the founding patent application in 1991); and another thing is to “prove” charges that RMBS defrauded the US patent office with the intent of monopolizing the industry. Remember, there was a guy that testified that in his 30 years of service in the patent office, he never saw so many inventions in one application. He was describing the original 1991 RMBS’s patent application. Regards, ST P.S. I enjoy very much reading your posts. Their form is flawless, fun to read, and probably the best written on any board. Now, as for their content, you would allow a disagreement here and there, won’t you?