Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (447)	7/1/2001 4:36:55 PM
From: Dr.MensaWannabe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3143

"Lisa will not be a plaintiff. That I can assure you right now, so you may imagine how that letter shall be received." Are you speaking on behalf of the law firm? If so, then say so and I think she will be contacting another firm this week. Ollie, your actions are suspect. Show me one post from ANYONE here on this thread or on this site that discourages people from coming forward and contacting THE LAW FIRM -who has accountability, privilege and a fiduciary responsibility. This is a clear cut example of you twisting words to fit your agenda. Back up your claim with evidence. PROVIDE ONE LINK. WHY DO YOU WANT PEOPLE TO PROVIDE THEIR FULL LEGAL NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER, AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO YOU? There are many posts by people who think potential plaintiffs should not come forward to you. I have seen none that discourage people from coming forward to the law firm itself. To change a line from Tomb Raider, your ignorance amuses me. Just because you make an accusation does not make it so. Just because you twist words to fit your agenda does not make it the posters intent. The law firm can easily find out Ms. Leeza's true agenda by calling her. Your representation that she will never be considered a plaintiff is quite disturbing. I take it you are speaking on behalf of the law firm? Please confirm.