Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (12412)	7/3/2001 5:27:56 PM
From: Getch	Respond to of 196649

I don't have the actual releases, but reduced royalty rate in China is for Domestically Produced And Sold Only. Any Chinese export will be subject to normal royalty rates.

To: carranza2 who wrote (12412)	7/3/2001 5:29:25 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196649

carranza: Suggest today is a day to enjoy. It has been clear all along that Qualcomm made some concessions on the licenses to Chinese companies for products to be used within China, but it has also been understood that the fees for export are similar to those elsewhere. The Koreans may moan and groan, and probably will, but they will also be riding the CDMA voice/data tornado worldwide with strong profits for themselves and an early entrant advantage, so I suggest you not lose too much sleep tonight over their words. Best. Chaz

To: carranza2 who wrote (12412)	7/3/2001 7:02:54 PM
From: foundation	Respond to of 196649

The lower license fees to the Chinese may bring claims that Q is not fairly and non-discriminatorily issuing licenses.. ---------- IMO, this will be resolved with 1xevdv - with China's LAS_CDMA being integrated into standard specifications and China owning a piece of cdma2000 - their license fees will naturally be lower - giving China vendors a structural advantage. IMO, this is why China is at the 1xevdv table to begin with.... This would render the issue moot.