Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (17708)	7/9/2001 10:49:23 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

"Yes , and all those "miracles " ? You didn't answer ..." There is a very simple reason that Paul does not concentrate on the miracles that Jesus did in His earthly ministry. First Paul was not an eyewitness to them, having met the risen Jesus on the road to Damascus. His message was to proclaim the power of the risen Christ to forgive sin, who, having paid the ultimate price, with His own sinless life, received the ringing endorsement of God through the resurrection from the dead. He did not deny any of the miracles of Christ, he simply built on what had already been established by the eyewitness of the Apostles. Would you plow a field twice? "and a little more tolerance" Who is the intolerant one? Why it's you Mars, you who refuse to allow any opinion but your own. You, who would force everyone to believe just like you. You, who continue to denigrate the beliefs of others as though it were a game. You, who are just the sort that would have stood at the foot of the cross and taunted Jesus, with, "Why hath thy God forsaken you for so long ?" Shame on you and your house. "how the world is filled with such evangelicals and so many fundamentalists, in Judaism , Christianity and Islam ...and how every one of you is right ". Are you saying that they are all wrong and you are right? It seems you missed yourself on the list. Would you recognize a self contradicting statement if it hit you in the third eye? I highly doubt it!