Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Sauna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (342)	7/8/2001 3:18:04 AM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1857

The Democratic scene is like the concierge desk at Auschwitz for young Jewish women. Even Janet gets into it when she is not persecuting young Cuban boys usajewish.com

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (342)	7/8/2001 4:19:22 AM
From: X Y Zebra	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1857

August, Believe me when I tell you: Don't waste your time. Message 13743489 (Make sure you read the post he responded to.) of course, to this date, the question remains unanswered... Message 13987884 That is why, (among other deficiencies of his), he seems to retain a sore arse... to wit... Message 13940504 So your choices are: 1) ignore him. 2) waste your time Good luck to you. The Blessed One has fallen upon you. (I hope you moved so he felled on his bare arse). Ah and be careful he may send you some of his strange "santerias" b.s. Message 13923148 Lastly, the liar... Message 13897883 Ah yes, and ROFLMAO.... Message 15406664 Now... I rather admire one of the greatest race car drivers that ever existed, than the pope & his imaginary friends... ho ho ho ho ho ho.... I quote from the above post... Internet attracts some weird creatures. AJ is just one of many that flock about. No weirder than Raelians, I suppose. At least HE doesn't want to clone Jesus from the shroud of Turin, or does he? As for his "honesty" (ggg) Message 15406378 This is a specific direct accusation that you have misquoted me, and an objection to your doing so. I believe you to be habitually dishonest. This is a chance to prove that in this case, at least, your "quote" was not a fiction. Show me where you got your quote or admit it wasn't a quote of me at all, only a phrase it suited you to present as one. his stupidity has no equal.... Message 14110841 LOL!! average joe. You should read links before suggesting they support your viewpoint! The second and third links you sent unequivically support the argument that circumcision DOES NOT increase cervical cancer. Only in the first link is the statement made that, "cervical cancer is very rare in the wives of circumcised Jewish men". The next 2 links dismiss circumcision as a CAUSATIVE factor in this. Low socio-economic status is given as a significant variable, i.e. cleanliness, etc.. The bottom of this post shows clearly that, whatever the prophylactic quality of being Jewish...it has NOTHING to do with circumcision! Having made my points for me, I think you've exhausted the subject, unless you have further points to make! LOL! (If you find it necessary to continue this subject, perhaps you would do us the courtesy of starting a "smegma" thread). ROFLMAO... The Smegma thread by a.j. THAT should make the "Hot Topics" in no time... (at least for one minute, once they realize a.j.'s size) A J does not support circumcision: Message 14109142 One could reason aj does not support circumcision because if he was cir-cum-sized (gggg) the world would know the size of his other head... and, given the above evidence, as the product of the one that "supposedly thinks", we can safely conclude the other one is can not be much of a "head". (GGGG) ROFLMAO and the best for last Evidently, he has NOT changed his ways... his posts are the result of masturbation-induced epilepsy, (when he was a child), as suggested by HIS OWN URL's Message 14112542 From the above: See your OWN reference (# 2) given in the post to Solon. For your convenience, I have provided the links and copied below the relevant part: cirp.org The hypothesis that human male smegma is carcinogenic was first formulated in 1932 by Abraham L. Wolbarst1. Wolbarst also believed that circumcision prevented epilepsy. (In the early part of the 20th Century, the paroxysm of masturbation in children was often misidentified as an epileptic seizure.) Wolbarst wrote: "[Circumcision] diminishes the tendency to masturbation, convulsions and other reflex phenomena of local irritation." Wolbarst's beliefs about circumcision were shared by other writers, such as Peter Remondino and Abraham Ravich. No laboratory or clinical research had been done on the subject at the time. Regardless, Wolbarst's hypothesis about smegma and cancer found its way into early medical textbooks. In the 1950s a few experiments were done to test the hypothesis by injecting horse smegma into wounds made in the backs of mice. There were clinical studies that attempted to induce cancer by introducing smegma subcutaneously and intravaginally: No carcinomas could be induced. SI retains a few Internet Quasimodos. Still a good laugh.