Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 16yearcycle who wrote (7854)	7/9/2001 1:28:30 PM
From: Bill Harmond	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57684

You have been right about Qualcomm for years now! I remember you telling me that 3G=Qualcomm.

To: 16yearcycle who wrote (7854)	7/11/2001 4:02:39 AM
From: damniseedemons	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57684

The big issue with 3G is that it's going to take longer than expected to get here. I think 2.5G (GPRS) is more than a transitionary technology. GPRS will be very successful and that success, among other things, will serve to delay mass market 3G rollouts. This is particularly true in markets where non-packet-data switched networks are currently prevalent (Read: most countries except Japan). If I were interested in this space I'd prefer to consider how to invest in 2.5G rather than 3G.