Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (139150)	7/12/2001 6:57:51 PM
From: fingolfen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Yep, a 2.2 would be a serious competitor. Yet it reminds to be seen if Intel is capable to manufacture it. Don't you mean "remains to be seen?" I'd expect to see it around late October/early November. No, your model is inaccurate. Given Anand's numbers, upper limit of projected score is 73.40@1600. You seem to be fixated on one benchmark... and it looks like a simple rounding difference... I ran all mine thru Excel and let it run the math... Although your numbers are inaccurate, the performance trend you captured is correct. However, your conclusion about "architectural league" is wrong. The current problem of AMD is not in the CPU but in the system chipset design. Six of one, a half dozen of another. I don't completely buy your chipset argument as you present no data that explains all of the benchmarks based on chipset differences. For the sake of argument, however, let's say it is chipset differences. Shouldn't AMD be providing an integrated solution? I could probably drop a Ferrarri 8-cylinder into a Toyota Camry with enough effort... but it wouldn't give the same level of performance as it would have in a Ferrarri...