SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boca_PETE who wrote (14748)7/13/2001 5:34:08 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42834
 
>>The arguments you raise in your post are specious and not relevant to the issue. It's a laughable stretch to talk about electric companies to accept stock in payment of electric bills when there likely are no such companies.<<

pete, it is laughable for microsoft to do it. however, i recall a small, cash strapped outfit paying bills with stock. how should it be accounted? please don't duck, dodge, or otherwise run away from this again.

how should it be accounted?

btw, you DID save $50k by not buying a mercedes. the difference is that NOTHING happened by NOT buying a mercedes. this makes your comparison silly.

however, if i OWNED a $50k mercedes (like msft OWNS their stock) and gave someone the option to sell it (like msft does) then i LOSE the value of the mercedes when sold. it is LOST in a REAL way, not a hypothetical way.

if i was incapable of generating income and had no savings, i could starve to death if that mercedes was my only possession. but, that wouldn't be a real death, would it? ;-)

the argument that the shares are struck at the current price so they have $0 value is absurd. they absolutely have time value, and the BILLIONS msft shelled out proves that time value can be quite lucrative.

msft gives an asset to employees with some value. i agree the valuation part is a challenge, but not impossible to approximate. aapproximations are well established in accounting, eg, depreciation. noncash transactions are handled all the time in accounting.



To: Boca_PETE who wrote (14748)7/13/2001 5:37:14 PM
From: D.R.HATCHER  Respond to of 42834
 
I have seen Brinker's port I,II and III compared to
the indexes posted on this board. I have not seen
Brinker's VTSMX passive buy/sell compared to the indexes.
How has he done historically market timing with VTSMX?
Can someone please post?

Thanx