Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (160834)	7/14/2001 4:20:29 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Dear pally, I did not see where they are spending millions to sequester carbon dioxide. I saw mention of studies into technology that sequesters carbon dioxide. Studies means building test facilities and exploring the process technology. Yes this does cost millions because a prototype of the scale required is big. A reasonable person says I don't see the proof of the proffer and I will study to see if we can determine if the proffer is correct. Also what is the extent of correct. Now a reasonable person of good faith would also study the technology to fix the problems and cause of the proffer. But what are the problems. If the CO2 is going to cause the problem then technology is needed to fix it. This is all long term stuff. You again suffer from the mental limitation of NOW. If someone is doing anything NOW it means I'm right and they are lying. All and all to me the no brain is build nuclear power to provide 80 to 90% of electric needs. Plan industrial co-location with nuclear power that may make for a cost effective use of electric power over burning current fossil fuels. I don't know if nuclear power or any electric power can ever be cheap enough to be used to create low carbon no carbon fuels vs other sources. THIS is seamanship. planning, just in case. This a totally alien concept to those who are vacant liberal minds. This is the only way the engineers and all with common sense think. read this and try and understanding that thinking what if over time is complex and does not translate into NOW this is the solution. watman.com The article as written grossly oversimplified a very complex set of issues and chose words to spin an AHA. I see this in every liberal media article and all the stuff from the green folks. tom watson tosiwmee