SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (80220)7/15/2001 12:37:56 PM
From: KymarFye  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 99985
 
"If you are making money, there are many more who are losing money."

Yeah, but I don't believe our beloved moondude has actually been trading his calls - he's just been calling them. He can't really be any more deserving of hostility than the billions of other people out there who are likewise uninvolved.

It may be too much of a burden for the board, but, as someone who trades a lot more than he "calls," it would be more meaningful to me if the market stances voiced here came with trades, at least proxy trades - e.g., "short QQQ at 45.9, full position, stop at 46.51" rather than "the techs look like they might be topping here." Anyone with much trading experience knows how having the "correct" market view by no means guarantees a successful trade if precise timing, stop levels, targets, position sizes, and so on are mishandled.

For all the open hostility shown towards American Spirit, at least he tells us what he's doing (if not with total specificity). Though he and I have little in common as traders, I appreciate that aspect of his posts, and I reject the criticisms of those who accuse him of touting simply because he's open about his long side bias, states what he's doing, and defends his rationale if it's attacked.



To: maceng2 who wrote (80220)7/15/2001 1:22:20 PM
From: eichler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Pearly,
???????
Your last post to me very recently was reminding me of #3 on the thread header....something about posts being civil....
I guess blatant sarcasm doesn't count.
Glad at least you are amused. Much better than other available methods of resentment and ridicule.
I am much happier seeing in print what I have been sensing in private.
Anyone else? Now's the time. Let's get it all out there....
Regards,
Eichler