SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (253)7/15/2001 2:09:37 PM
From: 249443  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1669
 
Ground Zero:

"The police are currently saying Condidit is not a suspect because they don't want to prejudice the case before they nail him....."

That is your opinion.

I take the police at their word. If they had proof that Mr. Condit committed the crime, he would be locked up right now and charged. That is, at least, the typical process when a person is a suspect and law enforcement has proof that an individual has committed a crime.

cj@1984isevil.gov



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (253)7/17/2001 12:33:22 AM
From: CVJ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1669
 
Without being charged with a crime, he can be asked questions without an attorney present and the rest of the Miranda rights. He doesn't have to answer and he is not under oath. The police can ask him anything they want. He doesn' have to answer or he can lie. But as soon as he is charged Miranda allows a big cone of silence without prejudice.

Chas·notanattorneybutIheardoneontvataHolidayInnExpress

sonofagun another prime# grub


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News