Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (310)	7/15/2001 4:43:16 PM
From: 249443	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

"So is it fair to infer from these comments (and in light of your non-response to bland's earlier questions) that "righteousness" in fact means nothing to you? As an ultimate political goal, specifically." What questions didn't I answer? I will answer any that I may have overlooked. To your above question, "righteousness" means nothing to the democratic party. The party, however, must act as if "righteousness" means something in its statements to the public. The public wants to hear good things: fairness for all, and righteousness for mankind as a goal. It's not realistic. But it puts the democrats in power, which is what is desired. Democrats in power creates power, alliances, money, friends-of-influence. It is better to have power than to seek power. As for me personally, I do have a moral.